Skuse v. Pfizer, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
SABATINO, P.J.A.D.
*542This case exemplifies an inadequate way for an employer to go about extracting its employees' agreement to submit to binding arbitration for future claims and thereby waive their rights to sue the employer and seek a jury trial.
The employer in this case emailed to its workforce what it called a "training module" (or "activity" or "course"). The module described the company's mandatory arbitration policy, as presented in a series of slides on computer screens. One screen provided employees with the opportunity to access a "Resource" link to the full text of the policy. In a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Patricia Atalese v. U.S. Legal Services Group, L.P. (072314)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- Knorr v. SmealSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- West Jersey Title & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- NAACP of Camden County East v. Foulke Management Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- ARGUN v. NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Amy Skuse v. Pfizer, Inc. (082509)(Mercer County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2020
- FERNANDEZ v. PRIMELENDINGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- GABRIELLA FALZO VS. GREEN JUMPERS SOUTH PLAINFIELD, LLC (L-4497-19, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- In re: REMICADE v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.