Legal Opinion

ARGUN v. NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 16, 2020No. 2:19-cv-14548Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MEHTAP ARGUN, Plaintiff, v. ; Civ. No. 19-14548 (KM) (MAH) NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC., OPINION ELISA RUGGIERO, and JOHN DOES 1-20, Defendants. . KEVIN MCNULTY, U.S.D.J.: Plaintiff Mehtap Argun worked at a Neiman Marcus store for over a decade before her employment ended in 2018. She sued the company and her managers, alleging she was terminated on the basis of ethnic/ religious or disability discrimination. Now before the Court is the motion of The Neiman Marcus Group LLC! and Elisa Ruggiero, pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act,

9…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API