Legal Opinion

State v. . Hunt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 13, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

At the call of this case for trial in the Superior Court, the Solicitor .for the State moved that the warrant upon which defendant was tried and convicted in the recorder’s court of the city of Thomas-ville be amended by inserting therein after the word “cartway,” the words “or other road over which the public had a right to travel.” The motion was allowed over the objection of defendant. Defendant’s exception to the order of the court allowing the amendment is not sustained. The amendment was allowed in order that the warrant should conform to the statute. Chapter 230, Public Laws 1927. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . PoythressSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. State v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. State v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. . GoffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. State v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API