Legal Opinion

Autem v. Mayer Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1916No. 20,246PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Cherokee district court; JAMES N. DUNBAR, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiffs appeal from an error sustaining a demurrer to their amended petition. The averments of this pleading in effect are that the plaintiffs contracted with the defendant for an option on a certain ninety acre tract of land at $50 an acre “for the mineral reserve under said land for all *380such land as contains coal in one vein that measures thirty-four (34") inches or more in thickness, to be determined by the drilling of said land. . . . Second party agrees within ten days, after finishing said drilling, to elect to take or reject, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robertson v. TalleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Banister v. FallisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Rettiger v. DannellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoard v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Riffel v. DieterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API