Autem v. Mayer Coal Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Cherokee district court; JAMES N. DUNBAR, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
West, J.:
The plaintiffs appeal from an error sustaining a demurrer to their amended petition. The averments of this pleading in effect are that the plaintiffs contracted with the defendant for an option on a certain ninety acre tract of land at $50 an acre “for the mineral reserve under said land for all *380such land as contains coal in one vein that measures thirty-four (34") inches or more in thickness, to be determined by the drilling of said land. . . . Second party agrees within ten days, after finishing said drilling, to elect to take or reject, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robertson v. TalleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Banister v. FallisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Rettiger v. DannellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hoard v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Riffel v. DieterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945