Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 27, 1977No. 7780PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

To the House of Representatives:

The undersigned justices of the supreme court return the following reply to the questions contained in your resolution filed in the supreme court on April 28,1977.

Your questions are as follows:

“I. Does House Bill 567, as drafted, conflict with Part I, Article 36 of the New Hampshire Constitution?
“II. Does the proposed amendment to House Bill 567 conflict with Part I, Article 36 of the New Hampshire Constitution?
“III. If the answer to question number two is ‘yes’, how does the proposed amendment to House Bill 567 differ from RSA 490:2, II and III, and from RSA…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
  2. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grinnell v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. Fabich v. FabichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  3. President Reagan's Ability to Receive Retirement Benefits From the State of California, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API