Legal Opinion
Pescosolido v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1983No. Civ. 6627PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (G. A.), P. J.
The Planning Director of the County of Tulare appeals from an order of the superior court which reversed a decision of the Tulare County Board of Supervisors (Board). The Board had held the Pescosolidos, in making certain gift deed conveyances to their children, violated the Subdivision Map Act and county ordinances and refused to order issuance of a certificate of compliance pursuant to Government Code section 66499.35 for parcels created by the conveyances. The Pescosolidos petitioned the superior court for review of the Board’s decision pursuant to Code of Civil…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Agins v. City of TiburonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Desmond v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- City & County of San Francisco v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Bardis v. OatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. City of Carson Mobilehome Park Rental Review BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.