Legal Opinion
Gureasko v. Polders
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 1959No. 4807PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRUGÉ, Judge ad hoc.
Louis Gureasko, plaintiff-appellant, filed suit for damages in the sum of $1,500 allegedly for defects growing out of a dwelling house which the defendant-appellee constructed for plaintiff. The contract is loosely drawn.
Judgment was rendered by the District Court for the plaintiff in the sum of $300 from which judgment plaintiff has appealed.
The conditions complained of are that five ceiling joists (4"x8"x26/) which had *581been installed were of inferior and undried lumber, and a green stain was bleeding through the varnish and that the concrete floor on the enclosed porch…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Germann v. 557 Tire Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Green v. Farmers' Consolidated Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- Bourdette v. SiewardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Schmidt v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Judice v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Loeb v. NeilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Henry Waters Truck & Tractor Co., Inc. v. RelanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Cotton v. NeedhamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Orleans Shoring Co. v. MurphyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Blaine Construction Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Insurance Company of North America, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.