Legal Opinion

Orleans Shoring Co. v. Murphy

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1963No. 991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YARRUT, Judge.

This suit seeks recovery by Plaintiff, shoring contractor, of $593.00, for raising and leveling Defendant’s residence at 3322 State Street Drive in New Orleans, per written contract, plus 6% interest and 25% attorney’s fee as provided therein.

Defendant admits the contract, but denies indebtedness because Plaintiff did not properly perform the work, which caused him to pay $1200.00 to repair the resulting dam*530age, and prayed in reconvention for $2000.-00, or a net judgment of $603.00 after offset of Plaintiff’s claim for $593.00.

The trial court allowed Defendant an offset of only…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murff v. Louisiana Highway CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Gureasko v. PoldersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Gowan v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campo v. LaNasaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Bourg v. Cane Air, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API