Legal Opinion

Cono Corporation v. Dr. Sheila Schils and EquiNew Therapy, LLC

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided January 6, 2026No. 3:24-cv-00703Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN CONO CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant, OPINION AND ORDER v. 24-cv-703-wmc DR. SHEILA SCHILS, and EQUINEW THERAPY, LLC, Defendants-Counterclaimants. This case ostensibly arises out of a dispute over access to several thousand horse treatment records, called “therapy cards,” which are owned by defendant EquiNew Therapy, LLC (“Therapy LLC”), but really turns on a failure by the parties to work cooperatively to develop the technology sold by defendant Dr. Sheila Schils in a stock purchase agreement. Generally,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Trade Finance Partners, LLC v. AAR CORP.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Deni Associates of Florida, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API