Legal Opinion

Ayash v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 17, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2021-2110Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHRISTOPHER AYASH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-cv-2110 (CRC) U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) has long had statutory authority to allow inmates to serve the tail end of their sentences in home confinement in order to ease their reentry into the community. In the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), Congress gave BOP expanded discretion, in appropriate cases, to release inmates to home confinement earlier in their sentences. Plaintiff Christopher…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  5. Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API