Hanson v. Rice
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Kandiyohi county to determine the boundary line between the adjoining lands of plaintiffs and defendants. The plan printed on pages 276 and 277, defendants’ “Exhibit 1,” illustrates the point in controversy. The case was tried before Powers, J., who found, as conclusion of law, that the boundary line between lot 7 and lots 2 and 4 was the quarter section line running north and south through section four.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Kandiyohi county to determine the boundary line between the adjoining lands of plaintiffs and defendants. The plan printed on pages 276 and 277, defendants’ “Exhibit 1,” illustrates the point in controversy. The case was tried before Powers, J., who found, as conclusion of law, that the boundary line between lot 7 and lots 2 and 4 was the quarter section line running north and south through section four. From an order denying a new trial, defendants, owners of lots 2 and 4, appealed. The grants of the government for lands bounded by streams and other waters,…
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, X
This action was brought under the provisions of Laws 1893, c. 68, to determine the boundary line between tracts of land owned by the respective parties. Plaintiffs had judgment in the court below, and defendants appealed from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The facts are as follows: Plaintiffs own fractional lot 7 in section 4 of township 121, range 35, Kandiyohi county, and defendants own fractional lots 2 and 4 in the same section. The boundary line sought to be established is that extending north and south between lot 7 and lots 2 and 4. Lot 7 lies immediately south…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Bidwell v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
- Shell v. MattesonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Security Land & Exploration Co. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. Longyear Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Tucker v. MortensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- In Re Petition of SchallerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Scheifert v. BriegelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Boekeloo v. KuschinskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.