Legal Opinion

Grube v. Grube

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Charles Grube, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 14th day of June, 1901, as directs the plaintiff to pay alimony t» the defendant pendente lite.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

This action is brought to obtain a divorce. The defendant denies the adultery and counterclaims for a divorce against plaintiff. That part of the order appealed from requires plaintiff to pay seven dollars per week alimony. The order also requires the payment of seventy-five dollars counsel fees and to this no objection is interposed. There has been no issue of the marriage.

It was shown and uncontroverted that on the 25th day of September, 1898, plaintiff, defendant, his wife, and a third party as *240trustee made a separation agreement in writing in the usual form, which they…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Collins v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Rose v. RoseNew York Court of Chancery · 1844

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Randolph v. FieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. Hay v. HayIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Robinson v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Randolph v. FieldAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914
  5. Holahan v. HolahanNew York Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API