Legal Opinion

State v. Lopez

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 8, 2011No. A10-678PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Before sentencing, Julio Lopez moved to withdraw his guilty plea to a misdemeanor theft charge. The district court denied Lopez’s plea-withdrawal motion, relying on cases that require a defendant to prove that withdrawal is necessary to correct a *381manifest injustice. On appeal Lopez argues that it is unfair and unjust to allow his guilty plea to stand because the district court failed to conduct the Minn. R.Crim. P. 15.02, subd. 1(3) inquiry and alternatively argues that he did not validly waive his right to counsel. We agree that on the facts of this case the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. State v. RaleighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. State v. TheisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Alanis v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campos v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  2. State of Minnesota v. Green Isiah Kelly, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. State of Minnesota v. Kai YangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API