Legal Opinion

Campos v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 16, 2011No. A10-1395PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

Appellant challenges the denial of his post-sentencing motion to withdraw his guilty plea, arguing that under Padilla, 559 U.S. at -, 130 S.Ct. at 1486, his counsel was constitutionally ineffective by failing to advise him that his plea carried a risk of deportation. Appellant argues that the district court erred by concluding that Padilla does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant Rene Reyes Campos was 17 years old when he was charged with felony simple robbery committed for the benefit of a gang in May 2009.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Alanis v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campos v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API