Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Haumesch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1936PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
E. G. Haumesch, attorney, petitions for writ of habeas corpus on behalf of Charles P. Stevens under sentence of death to be executed tomorrow, May 8, 1936. This petition should have been presented in the first instance to a United States District Court. Ex parte Davis (C.C.A.) 54 F.(2d) 723. The petition shows that Stevens was tried and convicted of murder in the superior court of the state of California in and for the county of Los Angeles. An appeal was taken from the conviction, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of California December 31, 1935. People v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Ex Parte DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
3Cited by17 opinions
- Miller v. HudspethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
- James Henry Audett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Moss v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Tompsett v. State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- United States v. RedfieldDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.