Legal Opinion
Doe v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 3, 2016No. 15 Civ. 8992 (LGS)Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge
Defendants Quest Diagnostics Inc. (“Quest”), Counseling Services of New York, LLC (“CSNY’), and Dr. Ferdinand B. Banez (“Banez”) move for attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to the Court’s June 2016 Opinion and Order granting Plaintiffs motion to dismiss without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(2), Fed. R. Civ. P. For the reasons below, Defendants’ motions are granted in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Familiarity with the facts and procedural background of this ease are assumed. In summary, Plaintiff Jane Doe filed a putative class action asserting…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of OnondagaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Bernstein v. Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Colombrito v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Catanzano v. WingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.