Legal Opinion

Meyers Sons v. Falk

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 28, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to a judgment of tie Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond, rendered February 13, 1900, in an action of tress-pass on the case, wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiffs in error were the defendants. Judgment for $1,750.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for an injury alleged to have been received by the plaintiff when stepping out of an elevator in the store of the defendants, where she was employed as a saleswoman.

It appears that the plaintiff had been in one of the upper stories of the establishment, and, after making a sale, was returning with the customer, on the elevator, to the lower floor; that when she attempted to leave the elevator she made a false step, in consequence of the elevator being six or eight inches above the level of the floor, and injured her knee, resulting in the loss of her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Cluverius v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1886
  3. Bailey v. . R., W. O.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Rockford City Railway Co. v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DriverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Co. v. Odle's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Big Stone Gap Iron Co. v. KetronSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  4. Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  5. Schaubuch v. DillemuthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API