Legal Opinion

Bailey v. . R., W. O.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1893PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The failure of the defendant to perform its duty to use reasonable care in the inspection of the brake, the defect in which caused the injury to the plaintiff, is the gravamen of the action.

The plaintiff was nonsuited on the ground that there was no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant. We think the case should have been submitted to the jury. The evidence shows that the plaintiff was employed as brakeman on a freight train of the defendant, running from Norwood to Rome. On the day of the accident, after the train had been made up at Norwood ready to start, five flat cars…

2Cited by36 opinions

  1. Galvin v. Brown & McCabeOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. McGuire v. . Bell Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Hankins v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Hankins v. New York, Lake Erie & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Koehler v. . New York Steam Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API