Legal Opinion

Suffield v. Carrington

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided December 30, 1998No. File No. 94 0543279PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The third party plaintiff, the water pollution control authority of the town of Suffield, moves for summary judgment on its cross complaint seeking foreclosure of its sewer assessment and user liens.

The facts are as follows: This action was started by the town of Suffield (town) to foreclose its tax liens recorded against the property of the defendants Franklyn H. Carrington and Carolyn R. Carrington (Carringtons). The water pollution control authority was made a defendant by virtue of its sewer assessment and user liens recorded against the Carringtons. When the town and the Carringtons…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Katz v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Shoreline Care Ltd. Partnership v. Town of North BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Tower Business Park Associates Number One Ltd. Partnership v. Water Pollution Control Authority of SimsburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Town of Suffield v. CarringtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API