Legal Opinion
Morris Electronics of Syracuse, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided June 20, 1984No. 83-CV-211PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
McCURN, District Judge.
Sections 2(d) and 2(e) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 13(d) and 13(e) (1976), make it unlawful, in substance, for a seller to furnish promotional and advertising allowances, services, or facilities to a customer in connection with the sale of a product unless such allowances, services or facilities are made available on proportionately equal terms to all other customers that compete for such product on the same level of distribution as the favored customer. See generally, F.T.C. v. Fred Meyer, Inc.,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Blue Shield of Va. v. McCreadySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Trade Commission v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- National Metropolitan Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- D.S. America (East), Inc. v. Chromagrafx Imaging Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Aventis Environmental Science USA LP v. Scotts Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Bachman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- State Bank of India v. Walter E. Heller & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Ashkanazy v. I. Rokeach & Sons, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.