Legal Opinion
State v. Dikes
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 4, 1981No. 16666PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANTU, Justice.
This is an appeal from a forfeiture proceeding brought under the Texas Controlled Substances Act. 1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The State brought suit against Three Thousand Forty-One Dollars in lawful U. S. currency claimed by Joyce Dikes and the law firm of Schulman, Walheim & Beck, Inc. The State alleged that the money was illegally obtained by Joyce Dikes through the sale of controlled substances. The law firm of Schulman, Walheim & Beck, Inc. intervened in the suit, asserting that the money the State was claiming had already been assigned to them by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Allen v. NesmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Fulcher v. Texas State Board of Public AccountancyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Nesmith v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Gasaway v. NesmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Harris v. Thompson Buick, G.M.A.C., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Portland Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Bernstein, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
- Commercial Credit Equipment Corp. v. West, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1984
- Anderson v. Higdon, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1985
- Nava v. Steubing, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
- Fifty-Six Thousand, Seven Hundred Dollars in United States Currency v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.