Legal Opinion

Narayan v. The Ritz-Carlton Development Company, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 2017No. SCWC-12-0000819PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAYAMA, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

In Narayan v. Ritz-Carlton Development Co., 135 Hawai’i 327, 350 P.3d 995 (2015) (Narayan I), this court held that the Plaintiffs, a group of individual condominium owners, could not be compelled to arbitrate claims arising from the financial breakdown of a Maui condominium project. In reaching this conclusion, this court determined that the arbitration clause was unenforceable because the Plaintiffs did not unambiguously assent to arbitration and because the terms of arbitration were unconscionable.

On January 11, 2016, the Supreme Court of…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sunday's Child, LLC v. Irongate AZREP BW LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
  2. Bentley v. Hickam Communities LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2024
  3. Bolos v. Grand Wailea A Waldorf Astoria ResortDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2024
  4. Eaton v. Capital Management Services, L.P.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2024
  5. Jabour v. Hickam Communities, LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API