Legal Opinion

Edrosa v. Chau

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 11, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00088Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BERNARDO EDROSA, Case No.: 19cv88-CAB-MDD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 13 v. DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [Doc. No. 51] 14 DR., JOHN K. CHAU, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First 18 Amended Complaint. [Doc. No. 51.] For the reasons set forth below, the motion is 19 GRANTED. 20 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 21 On January 12, 2019, Plaintiff filed a complaint under the Civil Rights Act 42

22 U.S.C. §1983

against Defendants J. Chau, California…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API