Legal Opinion

Temkin v. Shatford

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 28, 2006Published

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

Following a jury-waived summary process trial, the court found for the defendants on the plaintiffs’ claim for possession based on the determination that the plaintiffs failed to make proper service of a thirty-day notice to quit. The judge also found for the defendants on their respective counterclaims.

The plaintiffs filed this Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C, appeal of the judgment for the defendants on their counterclaims. Specifically, the plaintiffs argue that (1) because the trial judge found that the tenancy was not terminated due to the plaintiffs’ insufficient notice to quit,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Department of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. Mark Moore Homes, Inc. v. TarvezianMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
  3. Boston Spine Clinics, Inc. v. Middlesex InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
  4. Mitchell v. TiltonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
  5. Singer v. OpukaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API