Murphy v. Department of Correction
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.
The plaintiff, who is currently incarcerated, brought an action seeking a declaratory judgment that he is not required, under St. 1997, c. 106, § 8, to submit a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sample for inclusion in the State DNA database created by G. L. c. 22E. A judge in the Superior Court entered a declaratory judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The Commonwealth ap*737pealed. We transferred the case here on our own motion. We vacate the judgment and remand the case to the Superior Court for entry of a declaration that the statute by its terms applies to the plaintiff.
I
Statute 1997, c. 106,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Massachusetts Federation of Teachers v. Board of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Roe v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Chin v. MerriotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. McLeodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 1211 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.