Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Department of Correction

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 18, 1999PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.

The plaintiff, who is currently incarcerated, brought an action seeking a declaratory judgment that he is not required, under St. 1997, c. 106, § 8, to submit a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sample for inclusion in the State DNA database created by G. L. c. 22E. A judge in the Superior Court entered a declaratory judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The Commonwealth ap*737pealed. We transferred the case here on our own motion. We vacate the judgment and remand the case to the Superior Court for entry of a declaration that the statute by its terms applies to the plaintiff.

I

Statute 1997, c. 106,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Federation of Teachers v. Board of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Roe v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. Chin v. MerriotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. McLeodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 1211 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API