Legal Opinion
State v. Veburst
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 15, 1991No. 88-639PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Defendant Philip Veburst appeals his conviction, after a court trial, for possession of two or more ounces of marijuana, 18 V.S.A. § 4224(f)(1)(B). He attacks the validity of a warrant issued to search his residence and the trial court’s refusal to order disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant. We affirm.
On November 11,1987, Vermont State Trooper Thomas Roberts received a phone call from Detective Sergeant William Northrup of the Vermont State Police. Northrup informed Roberts that Franklin County State’s Attorney Investigator Gary Greenfield had contacted him with information…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. EmmiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- State v. BradleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- State v. DeyoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- State v. MaySupreme Court of Vermont · 2005