Legal Opinion

Warren v. De Long

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1936No. 3150PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

By the Court,

Coleman, J.:

This action was commenced to recover judgment against William M. De Long and Mabel De Long, his wife, upon certain promissory notes, and to foreclose a certain real and chattel mortgage executed June 1, 1927, to secure the same. Bill De Long and Jewell De Long, children of the above-named defendants, were made party defendants. Judgment was rendered against William and Mabel De Long in the amount of the unpaid balance upon the notes, plus certain sums paid out by plaintiff for taxes and attorney fees, and a foreclosure of the mortgage was decreed. Judgment was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thorpe v. SchoolingNevada Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Brooke v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  3. Goldsworthy v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State ex rel. Flack v. RogersNevada Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Zelavin v. Tonopah Belmont Development Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Havas v. AlgerNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Agricultural Insurance Co. of Watertown v. BiltzNevada Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API