Legal Opinion
Caiola v. Hammer
Passaic County Circuit Court, N.J.
Decided May 25, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wolbee, C. C. J.
This is a motion by the defendants to strike the complaint upon the ground that it fails to set forth a cause of action.
The complaint alleges that on November 9th, 1933, plaintiff was employed by Paterson Batten and Loom Builders, Incorporated, and was injured as a result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment; at that time the defendants were the principal stockholders of that corporation; that on April 35th, 1939, the defendants sold and transferred their shares to one Max E. Binz, and covenanted and warranted as further consideration, “that there…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holt v. United Security Life Insurance & Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Standard Gas Power Corp. v. New England Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
- Hackensack Trust Co. v. Vanden BergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- Chambers v. Philadelphia Pickling Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- Yellow Cab, Inc. v. Bankers Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. McNeilAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1958
- Forwood v. ESTATE OF DAVID W. GREENNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956