United States v. Wells
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
J. Lindsay Wells was charged with violating the Pure Food and! Drug Act, and he demurs to the information.
1Opinion of the Court
JMcOALL, District Judge.
This ease is before me upon demurrer to the information, wherein J. Lindsay Wells is charged with violating the Pure Food and Drug Act. Comp. St. 1913, §§ 8717-8728.
There are two grounds of demurrer: First. The information fails to allege that the statements therein contained had been sworn to, or that they were made upon oath before a United States commissioner. In fact, no affidavit had been made, or examination had, before a proper officer, previous to the filing of said information, touching the matters and tilings therein set out. Second. The information is not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. BaumertDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1910
3Cited by7 opinions
- Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Worthington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- United States v. McDonaldDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1923
- United States Ex Rel. King v. GokeyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1929
- Hunter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.