United States v. Baumert
District Court, N.D. New York
Information for violation of the pure food and drug law of the United States by George B. Curtiss, District Attorney, against Frank J. Baumert and others. On motion for process.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
The information, as to all material allegations, is made on information and belief, and charges the shipping, etc., in interstate commerce between Antwerp, N. Y., and points in the state of Pennsylvania, of misbranded cheese, in violation 'of the so-called “Pure Food and Drug Daw” (Act June 30, 1906, c. 3915, 34 Stat. 768 [U. S. Comp._St. Supp, 1909, p.U87]).
Annexed to the information which is verified by the oath of Geo. B. Curtiss, United States attorney for the Northern district of New York, to the effect that the allegations are true except as to the matters therein…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People ex rel. Livingston v. WyattNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Ex Parte BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- United States v. TureaudU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1884
- Johnston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1898
- People v. VasaloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Giles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
- Worthington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Weeks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- State v. LockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Poldo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.