Legal Opinion

McArthur v. Rosenbaum Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 7583PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment under Section 274d of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2201.

On plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, by order dated March 30, 1949, as amended on March 31, 1949, D.C., 9 F.R.D. 1, Judge McVicar held, inter alia:

1. The Declaratory Judgment Act provides a remedy for the lights asserted by plaintiffs in their petition or complaint and the complaint states a claim against the defendant upon which relief can be granted.

*62. The pleadings shovy an actual controversy exists between the parties.

3. The complaint does not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commercial Union of America, Inc. v. Anglo-South American Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. Price v. GreenwayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  3. Hoffman's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. 58-59 Realty Corp. v. Park Central Valet, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. McArthur v. Rosenbaum Co. of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. TCF Film Corp. v. GourleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  2. Pittsburgh Allied Fabricators, Inc. v. HaberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Pacific-Atlantic Steamship Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  4. Tcf Film Corporation v. GourleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  5. Gillespie v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API