Legal Opinion

McArthur v. Rosenbaum Co. of Pittsburgh

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 7583PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McVICAR, District Judge.

This action is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Defendant is in possession of the property involved in this case under two leases dated December 2 and 6, 1912. The plaintiffs, in their petition, aver:

“22. Defendant herein has claimed and continues to claim, under the original leases' of 1912, a right or preemption in the lessees and a duty upon the lessors to enter into a new lease agreement with the said defendant on the same terms and conditions that other bona fide parties are willing to enter into an agreement of lease.
“23. .…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Samuel Goldwyn, Inc. v. United Artists CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  2. Chidester v. City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  3. Norton v. United Gas Corp.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McArthur v. Rosenbaum Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Joscar Co. v. Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API