Barbara D. Ward v. W. E. Dearman
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants appeal from a three-judge court order in a Voting Rights Act suit. (42 U.S.C. § 1973c.) The three-judge court concluded that the action was moot and denied appellants’ request for attorney fees. Because we find that the case is moot and that the appellants are not prevailing parties under either the Civil Rights Attorneys Fees Awards Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 1988, or 42 U.S.C. § 19737(e), we affirm.
The relevant facts are clearly stated in the August 28, 1978 order of the three-judge court:
This action was commenced to restrain the placing on the ballot of certain candidates who had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Edward Brown v. Robert E. L. Culpepper, Jr., Superior Court Judge of the South Georgia Judicial CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- MTM, Inc. v. BaxleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coen v. Harrison County School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Castro County, Texas v. Joe CrespinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Davis v. City of EnnisDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- Henderson v. New York Life, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1997
- Kamont v. WestDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.