Keselyak v. Curators of the University of Missouri
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOUGLAS HARPOOL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11). The Court, after full careful consideration, hereby GRANTS Defendant’s motion.1
I. BACKGROUND
Pro se Plaintiff, a tenured professor at the University of Missouri Kansas City (UMKC) School of Dentistry, commenced the present action against her employer, the Curators of the University of Missouri (“University”), alleging the University violated her rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”). Plaintiff alleges she is employed as a tenured professor at the University and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Charles Richard Stone v. Rick Harry Anita Schlank Deborah Konieska Rhonda Heskin Amy Anderson Lori Parkos Jim LindCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harris v. Univ. of Missouri (UM)District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
- Hershey v. The Curators of the University of MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022
- Hoff v. JoyceDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2024
- Mathies v. Missouri Department of Social ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
- Whitmire v. Kansas City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.