Tunnell v. Van School Dist. No. 53
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Justice.
This record is substantially the same as on former appeal; plaintiffs, G. W. Swin-dall, his wife, and original defendant R. L. Wells, being now deceased, their heirs were properly substituted in fifth amended original petition filed September 9, 1935. A statement of the case and pertinent issues, for which remand was ordered, are fully set forth in Swindall et ux. v. Van School District, Tex.Civ.App., 37 S.W.2d 1094; Pure Oil Co. v. Swindall, Tex.Com.App., 58 S.W.2d 7. On first appeal, the judgment of the trial court was reversed and remanded as to defendant R. L., Wells only,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Deaton v. RushTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Austin Fire Ins. Co. v. Adams-Childers Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Lancaster v. FitchTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Nichols-Steuart v. CrosbyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sheffield v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Blalack v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Harris v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Bounds v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Genell, Inc. v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961