Legal Opinion

Brown v. Vail

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2010No. Nos. 83474-1; 83828-3PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

¶1 — This case began mainly as a constitutional challenge by three death row inmates, Darold Stenson, Cal Brown, and Jonathan Gentry (Appellants), to Washington’s three-drug lethal injection protocol for carrying out a sentence of death. The Thurston County Superior Court dismissed some claims on summary judgment and held a five-day bench trial in May 2009 to consider whether the three-drug protocol violated the Eighth Amendment prohibition against “cruel and unusual punishment” or Washington’s constitutional ban on “cruel punishment” in article I, section 14. The trial court upheld the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Baze v. ReesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anfinson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Jeffrey Haley, App/cross-resp v. Kathleen Hume, Et Ano., Resps/cross-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Scott v. HoukOhio Supreme Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API