Legal Opinion
Scott v. Houk
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 2010No. 2009-1369PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Scott v. Houk, 127 Ohio St.3d 317,
2010-Ohio-5805.] SCOTT v. HOUK, WARDEN. [Cite as Scott v. Houk, 127 Ohio St.3d 317,
2010-Ohio-5805.] Death penalty — Method of execution — Lethal-injection protocol — Ohio provides no postconviction-relief or other state-law mode of action to litigate issue of whether lethal-injection protocol is constitutional under Baze v. Rees — Lack of such a forum is not unconstitutional — Certified question of state law answered in the negative. (No. 2009-1369 — Submitted September 14, 2010 — Decided December 2, 2010.) ON ORDER from the United States District…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baze v. ReesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- In Re KemmlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- O'Neal v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021