Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Amerada Hess Corporation
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 17, 1975No. Civ. A. 73-277PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BECHTLE, District Judge. *
This matter is before the Court on the motions of defendants remaining in the action for summary judgment in a private civil action for damages based upon alleged violations of several statutes. These are §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2); § 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended by § 1 of the Robinson-Patman Act (15 U.S.C. § 13); § 3 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 14); and, § 210(a) of the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970, 83 Stat. 377 (12 U.S.C. § 1904 note). For reasons hereinafter stated, the motions will be allowed.
The original complaint,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Gee v. CBS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Southern Concrete Company v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Carlo C. Gelardi Corp. v. Miller Brewing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.