Legal Opinion
Dynamic Drinkware, LLC v. National Graphics, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 4, 2015No. 2015-1214PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Dynamic Drinkware, LLC (“Dynamic”) appeals from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) in an inter partes review not to reject claims 1 and 12 of National Graphics, Inc.’s (“National Graphics”) U.S. Patent 6,635,196 (the “'196 patent”) as anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) (2006). 1 See Dynamic Drinkware, LLC v. Nat’l Graphics, Inc., No. 2013-00131, 2014 WL 4628897 (P.T.A.B. Sept. 12, 2014) (“Board Decision”). Because Dynamic failed to carry its burden of proving unpatentability, we affirm.
Background
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- PowerOasis, Inc. v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Technology Licensing Corp. v. Videotek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Jeffrey Bernard Beeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Aqua Products, Inc. v. MatalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- In Re Magnum Oil Tools International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. Synvina C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, Aventisub LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.