Legal Opinion

Chickel v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided November 30, 2001Published

1Opinion of the CourtWelsh, J.

This is an action based upon a claim of negligence on the part of the defendants. The sole issue in this case was whether the claim was time-barred by the statute of limitations. The trial judge was persuaded that the claim was barred and allowed defendants’ motion to dismiss agreeable to Rule 41(b)(2), Mass. R. Civ. P. We agree with the trial judge.

The plaintiff asserts a negligence claim resulting from a fell in which she sustained personal injuries on July 10,1997 at the JFK MBTA station. This action was commenced July 22, 1999, more than two years after the accident The fall was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FryarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  3. Thomas v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Hearn v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Lavecchia v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API