Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 10, 1983PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

This case raises the question whether G. L. c. 161A, § 21, 1 the statute of limitations applicable to actions against the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), controls the time frame for commencement of actions of contract for personal injuries against the MBTA. We hold that § 21 governs actions of contract as well as tort for personal injuries sustained by a passenger of the MBTA.

While a passenger on an MBTA trolley car on March 19, 1979, the plaintiff suffered bodily injury. Almost three years later, on March 1, 1982, she commenced an action against the MBTA by filing a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. O'CONNORMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Scandura v. Trombly Motor Coach Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Tefft v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Herbert A. Sullivan, Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Ayala v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Schenker v. BinnsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  4. O'MALLEY v. Putnam Safe Deposit Vaults, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Sackett v. St. Mary's Church SocietyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API