Legal Opinion
Johnson Service Co. v. Roush
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 1960No. 35319PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.
This case involves the priority of payments from a fund of $16,118.54, which constitutes the unpaid balance on the contract price under a construction contract. The adverse claimants are the federal government, the Washington State Tax Commission, the American Surety Company of New York, Moses Lake Consolidated School District No. 161, and the contracting firm of West-over and Hope.
The case comes to us upon a short record. The facts are stipulated and may be summarized as follows:
On or about February 3, 1954, Moses Lake Consolidated School District No. 161 (hereinafter referred to as the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Morgan v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Durham Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- DeHeer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Brandt v. ImperoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Schwab v. Washington State Bar Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Home Indemnity Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.