Legal Opinion
Lowrance v. Achtyl
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 29, 1994No. 526, Docket 93-2391PublishedCited by 237 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge:
The principal issue in this pro se appeal is whether state prison officials satisfied due process requirements when they held an inmate in administrative confinement for two days. The pro se plaintiff, Jory Lowrance a/k/a Ya’Qub Shamsid-Deen, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, DiBianco, M.J., granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants and dismissing Shamsid-Deen’s complaint alleging that the defendants violated 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 All of the- defendants, Correction Officer Achtyl, Sergeant Skrocki,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by237 opinions
- Bayerische Landesbank, New York Branch v. Aladdin Capital Management LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Joyce Bickerstaff v. Vassar CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Graham v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Mcpherson v. CoombeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Graham v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
232 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.