Legal Opinion

State v. Simpson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 23, 1998No. 97-2200PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

The jury convicted Clarence Simpson of possession of a controlled substance (cocaine). He appeals, contending that the district court violated his constitutional rights when it refused to grant use immunity to his proffered witness. We disagree and affirm.

Waterloo Police Officer Robert Hewitt stopped a vehicle driven by Clarence Simpson for having expired license plates. Jamie Keller occupied the front passenger seat and Rodney Caeser occupied the rear passenger seat.

Simpson consented to a search, at which point Hewitt had both passengers exit the vehicle and stand to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Glen Smith, Elton Rieara, Elvis Smith and Roland GeorgesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. State v. FoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Donald Lyle ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. Klouda v. Sixth Judicial District Department of Correctional ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. World Book, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re the Adoption of S.J.D.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  5. In re Aaron Thomas M.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API