Hines v. California Public Utilities Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Donna Hines appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in her employment action against the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) and other defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo both a grant of summary judgment and a dismissal for failure to state a claim. Barnett v. Centoni, 81 F.3d 813, 815-16 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam). We affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment on the Title VII race discrimination claim because Hines failed to raise a genuine dispute of 'material fact as to whether the CPUC’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Padgett v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Francisco Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, Erroneously Sued as Los Angeles County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ahmed v. WormuthDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Hernandez v. Maricopa County Community College DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Kurdi v. California Department of TransportationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023