Verstine v. Yeaney
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 52, Oct. T., 1904, by H. H. Brosius, John B. Myers and W. H. Stamey, from decree of C. P. Jefferson Co., April T., 1903,-No. 1, on bill in equity in case of F. L. Verstine et al., trading as Verstine, Hibbard & Company v. Susanna Yeaney et al. •Bill in equity for partition. Before Reed, P. J. Tbe facts are stated in tlie opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned among others was the decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Bbown,
At the time of the death of John Yeaney the legal title was in him to the undivided fourth of the real estate, of which partition was sought by the proceedings below. When they filed their bill the plaintiffs owned the remaining three fourths. By the twenty-second clause of his will, Yeaney directed that so much of his estate as he had not disposed of in the preceding clauses should be divided among those who would inherit from him under the intestate laws of the state. All of the defendants except the three appellants are those persons. They were made parties to…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Barnes v. ReaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Hodges v. Lake Summit Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Intermet Realty Partnership v. First Pennsylvania Bank N.A. (In Re Intermet Realty Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Awbery v. SchmidtMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Bartlesville Oil & Improvement Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.