Legal Opinion

Ballard v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 31, 1994No. 55, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

The issue here involves the rule requiring corroboration of the confession of an accused by some independent evidence of the corpus delicti We return to this well plowed ground because of the contentions of the petitioner, Robert Leslie Ballard, Jr. (Ballard), who stands convicted, inter alia, of felony murder in an attempted robbery. Ballard contends that corroboration of the corpus delicti in this case requires independent proof of the attempted robbery. As explained below, this contention greatly overstates the corroboration requirement.

Ballard was convicted by a jury in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Hadder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. DeJesus v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API