Legal Opinion
Costanzo v. DXC Technology Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 27, 2020No. 5:19-cv-05794Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 NEIL COSTANZO, et al., Case No. 19-cv-05794-BLF 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 10 DXC TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, et al., [Re: ECF 39] 11 Defendants. 12 This is a putative class action pursuant to Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 13 (the “Securities Act”) arising from the prospectus and registration statement (the “Registration 14 Statement”) issued in connection with the merger of Computer Sciences Corporation and the 15 Enterprise Services…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.