Legal Opinion

Codd v. Von Der Ahe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1916No. 13346½PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J., entered November 9, 1915, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

Action on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage upon certain real estate securing the same. In the complaint it was alleged that the note and mortgage were executed by defendants Jacob Gundlach and Ellen Gundlach, his wife, on March 18, 1910, to defendants George Von Der Ahe and Bertha Von Der Ahe, who thereafter assigned the mortgage and indorsed the note to plaintiff, who now holds them; that, on March 18, 1915, plaintiff presented the note to Gundlach and wife and demanded payment, which was refused, and that, on the same day, he notified defendants Von Der Ahe of such presentment,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cotes v. BennettIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Mattson v. Eureka Cedar Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Eggleston v. MorrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Robertson v. ShineWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Michaelson v. OvermeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adams v. ErnstWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Farm Credit Bank v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. State v. Diamond Tank Transport, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. American Fuel Co. v. BentonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State v. GoardWashington Supreme Court · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API