Legal Opinion

Rodstrom v. Strum

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1942No. Docket No. 38, Calendar No. 41,961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Augusta F. Rodstrom, plaintiff, is the widow of Otto Rodstrom, deceased, who was a brother of Neis F. Strum, defendant, the latter evidently having dropped the first syllable from his surname. He was the owner of a farm of 156 acres or thereabouts. On or about May 1, 1928, and for a considerable period prior thereto, plaintiff and her husband were the caretakers of a large apartment building in Chicago, Illinois. They were earning $248 per month, and also were given the use of an apartment without any extra charge for heat, light, gas, water or refrigerator. Plaintiff claims that defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Houten v. VorceMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Groening v. McCambridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Sieg v. SendelbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Tincknell v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mahon v. SahrationMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Green v. BambrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API